Monthly Archives:
January 2006

Lightbulbs on Other People's Heads

Some are dimmer than others, but check out these few links.

A rose by any other name . . .

They have a skull. But whose is it? They have done tests on it for months. But whose brain did it hold? And what kind of tests are they doing? And what do they think they can learn from an uninhabited skull?

They have a skull which some think the previous owner was Mozart. But they do not know for sure.

The skull which is being tested has, since 1902, been kept by the International Mozarteum Foundation in Salzburg, where Mozart was born.

What I am curious about is this: Mozart was born in a Mozarteum? Was he named after the building he was born in? That would be like naming me “Hospit” because I was born in a hospital. Or naming Jesus “Mange” because he was born in a manger. Or, to stay true to form here, “Stab” because the building was a stable.

Just think. Stabby Christ. The Christian religion would likely have been a little different. Back to the manger. Isn’t “manger” French for “to eat.” Image a crib with teeth. Changes how you look at things, doesn’t it?

Now back to the Mozart skull. Are there any more important things to study, and spend money and time on? Is knowing who used the skull as a brain carrier that important? What if they find out that it was someone else’s? And if it was Mozart’s, will they get reward money for returning it?

“Ooooh, look it is an empty skull. Cool. I hear Mozart used one just like it when he was alive.”

Increase means Decrease?

I am not an economist. I am not a mathamatician. And there are other things that I am not. But this I don’t understand

A Tory plan to raise personal income taxes on low income earners is part of an overall tax strategy that will result in more tax relief for Canadians, Tory MP Jason Kenney said Friday.

The Conservatives want to decrease taxes by going back on a tax cut that the Liberals instituted before the election? To decrease taxes we have to raise them? And to increase government revenue we have to give tax cuts/rebates/credits to businesses? I do not understand.

Why is increasing the taxes on the lowest bracket the answer to decreasing taxes overall? And the $250 – $500 GST savings would be swallowed up by new income taxes. Where is the savings? (And, ummm, show me the money! ?)

Reality Check

With 2 weeks and a weekend until the election it is time for a reality check. What are we dealing with?
Cat Fight
Blunder-Cat Fight. (Photo taken before the fight.)

No Ambiguity Here. I welcome other interpretations.

The Conservatives have said they would not form a coalition with another party. But they say they could work with the NDP. I figure the only common ground between these two parties would be found in a coffee-maker at Tim Hortons. It seems Harper is a little ambiguous. And, so I am told in comments on this site, Harper’s objective is to prove Paul Martin to say one thing and do another. It seems that is the case. But it also seems that Harper is a bit ambiguous here. That is not to say that he would NEVER EVER say one thing and do another. (Consider health-care for a moment.)
Click for Larger Image

I devised a basic ambiguity test. After running the test I found that the NDP were the least ambiguous. The criteria for the test was simple. Which ever name (Conservative, Liberals, or NDP) had the least anagrams would be found to be the least ambiguous. Lo and behold, there are no anagrams in “NDP”. There are some in “Liberals” and many many more in “Conservative.”

I have selected the ones I like best from both and listed them here. I also grouped them somewhat to make the list easier to read.

Conservative
  • A VOICER VENTS.
  • ON EVASIVE CRT
  • NAIVER COVETS
  • RAVINE COVETS
  • NO VICE VERSA
  • ASCOT IN VERVE
  • ONE VARVE CIST
  • SO, NAIVETE VCR
  • NAVES COVER IT
  • VAN CRIES VETO!
  • AS COVERT VINE
  • AS COVERT VEIN
  • A CONVERT VISE
  • VANE IS COVERT
  • VANE IS VECTOR
  • CAVE OR INVEST
  • CAVE VINES ROT
  • STIR CAVE OVEN
  • VOTERS CAVE IN
  • VAN CRIES VOTE!
  • A VCR ON STEVIE
  • A VCR TIES OVEN
  • A OVEN SITE VCR
  • A VCR VIES NOTE
  • A VCR VIES TONE
  • A COVE STRIVEN
  • A COVE INVERTS
  • A COVERT VINES
  • A COVEN RIVETS
  • SAVE IN COVERT
  • SAVE COVER TIN
  • CARVE IN STOVE
  • A VICTORS EVEN
  • STARVE NOVICE
  • I COVET VERNA’S
  • OVERCAST VINE
  • OVERCAST VEIN
  • VINES OVERACT
  • VEINS OVERACT
  • A VECTOR’S VEIN
  • SAVE IN VECTOR?
  • CAN VISE VOTER?
  • CAN OVERT VISE?
  • CAN’T VISE OVER . . .
  • SAVOR VICE TEN!
  • OVA CITES VERN
  • TACOS VIE VERN
  • AS CONVERT VIE
  • ACORNS VIE VET
  • CANS VIE VOTER
  • TAVERN’S VOICE
  • TAVERN VOICES
  • SAVE VOTER INC
  • NOR EVICT VASE
  • I STAVE VCR ONE
  • I SAVE VCR NOTE
  • EATS OVINE VCR
  • EAST OVINE VCR
  • SO, ANTI-VCR EVE?
  • OVINE CAR VEST
  • VETO CAR VINES
  • VOTE CAR VINES
  • CAR VEINS VETO
  • CAR VEINS VOTE
  • ACT REVIVES ON
  • NO ACT REVIVES
  • ANTS CO-REVIVE
  • SCAN TO REVIVE
  • VAN COVERS TIE
  • NAVES EVICTOR
  • VERONA EVICTS
  • STEVE VIA CORN
  • NEVER VIA SCOT
  • NO VICAR STEVE
Liberals
  • AIRS BELL
  • A BELL, SIR?
  • SELL A RIB
  • LABEL, SIR
  • SIR BELLA
  • BARE ILLS
  • ILL BEARS
  • ILL SABRE
  • I SELL BAR
  • I BALLERS
  • AS BILLER
  • ARE BILLS
  • ERA BILLS
  • EAR BILLS
  • ERAS BILL

The Future Role of Government

Canada is a great place to live. I think so, at least. According to Jack Layton, Harper does not like it and wants it gone. Or at least any vestige of the Canada we know. Harper’s idea is to grant more power to the provinces and restrict the federal government’s control. That is what the Bloc wants too. But the Bloc wants it more for itself than the rest of Canada. Harper, in my opinion, wants it more for Alberta.

The Canada I love tries to take care of its own people: Through health care, social security and the whole social safety net. The safety net is something provided by the government for the people. The reason for the government’s very existence is for the people. Not the people for the government. Conservatives would argue that by paying taxes the people become the reason for the existence of government. That is not so. The government exists to help people. In order for government to function we must pay taxes. Harper would argue that the private sector would best meet our needs. Competition and so on. But where would the military get money except from taxes.

If the private sector is better at meeting our health care needs, why not have private firms provide defense? Because then we would be paying protection money to gangster corporations and payed assassins. And our enemies could outbid us. The loyalty would be to those who pay the most. But when it is the health of the people it appears that we are supposed to suspend disbelief and accept that a private firm would treat us right no matter how much or how little we can pay or afford.

In Canada, even though taxes are higher, we pay less than Americans on health care (as a percentage). But not all Americans receive the benefit of all that money spent. In the Canada I love you do not need money to actually receive the care that you require. I personally feel better knowing that if I lose my job and get real sick I can still get medical attention.

Jack Layton also is proposing help for Canadians to receive the medication they require. I know a number of people with different ailments that need to budget for their medication. One person in particular, someone I care very much about, has ailments that require a number of medications that are rather expensive. And her ailments have nothing to do with anything she has done. She is one of a handful in the world with a particular ailment. Is it right for her to suffer and potential die for something that is not her fault?

Most importantly, in this election it is NOT a choice between Harper or Martin. The choice is between a Canada that cares or a Canada that does not. Harper’s Canada cares not about health care but the military. Martin’s Canada cares not about regular Canadians but his elite social circle. Jack Layton not only is the only candidate left that can make a noticeable difference, his party is the only one that fights for Canadians every time, all the time.

The Canada I believe in includes my mom, dad and brothers. It also includes the squeegee kids and the vagrants. It includes Harper and Martin on the same level as my co-workers, friends, family and the guy I sat next to on the bus. By including these people as being real people, my Canada demands that they all be cared for properly first. Defending a country against “terrorists” who supposedly hate us is as ridiculous as preparing to fight aliens or robots. We would better be preparing for the inevitable Loch Ness, Big Foot and Yeti team up (under the direction of Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa) when they try to take on the world. Or is it David Koresh, Adolf Hitler and Osama Bin Laden that we are worried about? I can’t keep track.

I figure if the government should not be running health care then it should not be running anything. Let private firms take care of immigration, the military, border patrolling, military training and fighting, policing, foreign affairs, the Senate, trade deals and, most importantly, hiring the firms that do these things. And then let people pay these firms themselves or let corporations pay them. If we get invaded and you did not pay your protection money. Tough luck. Or if you get mugged and cannot show your monthly protection pass to the police in time then you get stabbed and you will have no money to pay the hospital (you just got mugged dude).

56 Priorities

The Conservatives seem to have a very selective intellect. They are not complete idiots. They know quite a bit. They have all the pieces but they can’t put a puzzle together. It appears that Paul Martin likes to call things that are important in some way or another “a priority.” He also said that if “you have 40 priorities you have none.” So the Conservatives made a list of 56 things he calls a priority. So, what I want to do is to compare Paul Martin’s priorities with Stephen Harper’s commitments. I will try to match, as best I can, the similar elements. Please note that the main reason this list exists in the first place was to show how Paul Martin has oh-so-many priorities. But Harper has just as many, albeit somewhat different, priorities. It is just that Harper does not call it a “priority.” Everyone knows that looking out for #1 is his priority, no? So here, compare and contrast. (and let me know if I should add or edit something to make it more clear.) And here is the Toronto Star’s article on the “56 Priorities of Martin” list.

Paul Martin Stephen Harper
1. New Deal for Municipalities and Cities A Different Deal – Alter what cities and Municipalities get, even though they wanted it.
2. Healthcare in General Healthcare in Hell –
“We also support the exploration of alternative ways to deliver health care. Moving toward alternatives, including those provided by the private sector, is a natural development of our health care system.” – Stephen Harper, Toronto Star, October 2002.
3. Healthcare Wait Lists Waiting List Time Guarantee
4. Home-care Program See (2) Healthcare in General
5. Education Education Tax Credit of up to $500 which would work out to $80 (if my math is correct).
6. Healthcare and Education in Africa Education in Africa but not important enough to be a priority (so it seems)
7. Stronger Economy Small business tax, larger business tax cuts, GST tax cut, income tax cut . . .
8. Canada’s Role in the World Army, fight, blood, kill
9. Environment Tax Credit for Transit Users and drop Kyoto
10. Western Alienation It is imperative to take the initiative, to build firewalls around Alberta, to limit the extent to which an aggressive and hostile federal government can encroach upon legitimate provincial jurisdiction.
11. Aboriginal People Aboriginal self-rule(for Harper but not full Caucus)
And racism for Tom Flannigan (a former Harper advisor)?
12. Childcare Pennies for Mommies and Daddies
$1200 / (50 weeks * 5 days * 8 hours) = $0.60 an hour for a babysitter.
13. Foreign Policy in General Continue to fight in someone else’s war. Continue to needlessly send our own troops into harms way.
14. Protecting the Arctic Arming Polar Bears to watch the newly created beaches
15. Making Parliament Work Making Government Work(?)
16. Equalization Fix the Imbalance between Ottawa and Provinces but ignore the imbalance between provinces.
17. Tax Cuts Not just tax cuts but more tax cuts and tax credits to boot.
18. Agriculture Family farms but get rid of the Wheat Board even though the family farm benefits from it and the large-scale farms are hurt by it.
19. BSE Mad Cow is not the problem, our relationship with the US is.
20. Canadian Passports Passports – should they be necessary? I have my driver’s license.
21. Canadian Contracts in Iraq 10 Canadians fighting in Iraq
22. Softwood Lumber Softwood Lumber – abandoning trade with the US
23. Federal-Provincial Relations Fed-Prov Relations – A renewed partnership, whatever the hell that means
24. Governing Winning (kinda obvious) but also dictating (in my opinion) what Canada should be rather than what it is.
25. Clean Water No opinion found. No talk of NAFTA or bulk water exports either. Exports would likely reduce the clean water we have got.
26. Replacing the Sea Kings Equip. Fight. Kill. Bathe in Blood.
27. Equipment for Canadian Forces in General Shoot. Destroy. Blow shit up.
28. AIDS funding AIDS – more needs to be done but focus is on Cancer
29. Affordable Housing I found nothing. Is it safe to assume that this would be something neglected by Harper?
30. Debt Servicing Pay down the debt (I can only guess that is what he would want to do, sounds reasonable) – but Paul Martin suggests the Tories would only make it worse (like Mike Harris did).
31. Fisheries Fisheries – Defend the fisheries
32. Third World Poverty and Pandemics Nothing. I found nothing. If you know of something, tell me. I will add it.
33. Research and Development Retool the family farm, research and develop emerging markets, and promote the use of biodeisel. A bad plan. Why not make mandatory ethanol blended gasolines?
34. Global Terrorism See (8) Canada’s Role in the World, and (14) Protecting the Arctic
35. National Sovereignty Bang, bang, reload See also (14) Protecting the Arctic, and (8) Canada’s Role in the World
36. Canada-US Border See (20) Canadian Passports, and (36) Canada-US Border
37. Intelligence (CSIS) Found nothing. (Harper, intelligence?)
38. Expanding the Armed Forces Fight, kill, destroy, blood, bang, bang, bang.
39. Prosperity Prosperity is with us
40. Improving Jobs Found Nothing. I guess tax cuts = more jobs, so then See (7) Stronger Economy, and (17) Tax Cuts
41. Peace in Sri Lanka Found Nothing. But if there is a conflict then likely it is Ready, Aim, Fire.
42. China and India If the US does not co-operate then off to China or India.
43. Windsor-Detroit Border Crossing Unsure, maybe see (36) Canada-US Border
44. Money for Newfoundland See (16) Equalization
45. Same-sex Marriage Re-open the Debate
46. Immigration Unsure. Either (a) make it easier for foreign professionals to get jobs or (b) keep foreigners out.
47. Urban Transit See (9) Environment (because taking the bus is the only way to save the environment)
48. Human Rights Concerns with China See (42) China and India
49. Opportunity to succeed See (39) Prosperity
50. Peace in Sudan See (41) Peace in Sri Lanka
51. Prosperity in New Brunswick See (39) Prosperity
52. British Columbia Bang, bang. The West Coast is ours
53. Banning Handguns It is the crime, stupid. Not the gun
54. Democratic Deficit/House of Commons Reform Democratic Reforms (we’ve got a long history of it ya know.)
55. Pacific Gateway Pacific Gateway
56. Transportation Infrastructure Unsure, See (47) Urban Transit

Up; the New Down.

The polls are the news of the day. Anyone who says that they do not look at the polls or don’t think they mean anything is somewhat of a liar. If the Conservatives are down in the polls then the Liberals are happy. And right now the Conservatives are happy. And rightfully so. Even if the polls do not tell the whole truth or even part of a story, they do shed light on the subject.

According to the Ipsos poll for December 29-30 the Conservatives are up on the Liberals by one point. The fact that the Cons are ahead by one appears to be the big news. But they gained very little. The Liberals, on the other hand, when compared to the previous Ipsos poll are down by one point. But the big news should be that the NDP have gained two points from the last Ipsos poll and four over the last SES poll.

But when compared to the November 22-28 Ipsos poll the Conservatives are up only by three points, the Liberals down by two, and the NDP are up by two. The Greens have stayed the same and the Bloc is down by three.

Another interesting tidbit is found when you look at the undecided. Ipsos polls have fewer undecided. About ten points worth. Why is that?

But what is the News here exactly? The NDP are up again. But because the Conservatives are up too does that mean that up is the new down? Or are polls not actually news? Considering that there will be a new poll soon leave all the social scientists scratching their collective head. With all the shit that hit the fan over the “break” did the Liberals only lose one notch and the Conservatives gain one or so? Do these polls actually reflect anything except that not much has actually changed?

Up is down, down is up. Inside, outside, up-side down? Marvin K Mooney will you please go now?

— Addendum —

While polls don’t mean much in and of themselves they do kind of dictate how people may think following the release of a poll. For someone to vote Conservative to keep the Liberals out is stupid unless you actually support their policies. Voting Conservatives tells the Conservatives that you think they would govern best. If you prefer the NDP but are worried about the Conservatives winning and so you vote Liberal gives the message that you support the Liberals. Strategic voting is a failed cause. (And check out Anacharsis’ take on strategic voting)

I suggest that if you like the NDP, for example, but are fearful that the Conservatives would win that you should give a shout-out to all the NDPer’s in your area to vote for the Christian Heritage Party or the Marijuanna or the Marxist-Leninsts. That way some other party would win and we can finally destroy this stupid two-party tyranny that has somehow invaded our system.

Strategic voting is just a vote for a continued binary system.

Choose Your Own Adventurer

In case you don’t know who to vote for you can take this quiz. Although it is for the 2004 Election I think we can at least all agree that the election is at least vaguely similar. Or you can take the CBC’s “Vote By Issue” Quiz. I get basically the same results. Who would’ve thunk it?

Here are my results from the PoliticsWatch 2004 Quiz:

J.Layton – Jack Layton Leader of the New Democratic Party of Canada (score = 100)
G.Duceppe - Gilles Duceppe Leader of the Bloc Quebecois (score = 67)
P.Martin – Paul Martin Leader of Liberal Party of Canada, Prime Minister of Canada (score = 33)
S.Harper – Stephen Harper Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada (score = 10)

And a Tip o’ the Hat to Following Frodo via the Green Knight.

Folle Lok en Seine

Happy New Year (or Folle lok en seine as they say in Frisian). I spent my New Year’s eve playing hockey with some friends. Realizing how out of shape I am and then doing a little drinking. We then hung out for a while and had a good time. We listened to CBC Radio One for the count-down and cheered. Yahoo!

Then I went outside, walked down the street to what is known in Winnipeg as Confusion Corner and I watched the Fireworks that were being launched from the Forks. I figure it makes sense that I started the New Year at a place with marked confusion looking at the activities from another crossroads.

I don’t know what the future will bring for me because I am trying to figure out the present and determine what I actually want to happen in the future. I do not know.

While walking down the sidewalk after midnight someone from behind a tree yelled out to me “Happy New Year.” I wished him the same. He then said something. I asked him to clarify. He said “I drink along.” I asked him what he was drinking. “Wine” and he held up a big bottle. “You can join me if you want.” I told him my head hurt and that is why I was outside. He said “Well then have yourself a Happy New Year.” I wished him likewise and we parted ways.

And so to mark this year as something new and as an attempt to declare this year as something totally different from this last year I started by upgrading to WordPress 2.0 and changing the look of my site. I also decided to keep my old standby New Year’s Resolution of “No Cavities” and will add some others at a later point. Including finding a job of which I can truly be proud. I am tired of standing at an intersection of life marked with confusion.